Oliver Sacks as a Philosophical Role Model

In the latest issue of “The New York Review of books,” Michael Greenberg reviews Hallucinations (knopf), the latest book by neurologist and physician Oliver Sacks. The review begins with this passage:

Oliver Sacks is the scientist-as-artist, a rare species nowadays but one that flourished in the mid-nineteenth century and that almost single-handedly he has kept alive. His sensibility is Victorian in the best meaning of the word: reformist, literary, historical—empirical of course but speculative as well, in the tradition of the grand theorists of that less specialized time. As a neurologist, Sacks is a clinician above all, an unusually close listener to his patients’ symptoms and stories. He prefers to look through a wide-angle lens rather than a microscope. His impulse is to amplify his observations, to look beyond the minute workings of the brain to the varieties of human experience itself, something he has done much to map out in the medical case histories that comprise the core of his finest writing.

This isn’t to suggest that he doesn’t value the groundbreaking research of neuroscience’s current pioneers, who are in the process of adding, in steady increments, to our understanding of memory and perception, but rather that his particular mission, as I suspect he sees it, is to apply their findings philosophically, to the soul.

Although this introduction appears at first to fall closer to the empiricist and scientific rather than philosophical and esoteric spectrum, I would argue that this description of one of our most important observers of the human condition may well serve as a role model for much of what we teachers and students do at UPR.

The philosophy and psychology we teach and study also moves in a continuum of human knowledge and condition, one which in the broader world moves from the strictly material and empirical through the subjective, speculative, esoteric to mystical nature of what it means to be fully human.

We here are constantly judging and being judged as to where on this continuum we live and work. It should be clear enough that this university, arising from and connected to the Philosophical Research Society, celebrates the esoteric and mystical as it is reflected in the wisdom traditions of world cultures. It is also clear that as such, our identity confronts a historical tendency away from the wisdom traditions in favor of scientific and empirical knowledge, both increasingly reductionist in character.

What Oliver Sacks represents is, I would argue, an effective and accurate measure of how to confront that reductionism. His work holds out the possibility of a sacred, even mystical element that we here regard as both true and necessary if humanity is to survive and be fully human. And what is the salient quality that Sacks displays? It is wonder, that underpinning of all genuine philosophic inquiry, and that quality or temperament that makes us human. But we also have to recognize that this new book is entitled Hallucinations, which are defined as sensory experiences of something that does not exist outside the mind, caused by various physical and mental disorders, or by hallucinogenics, or by what sacred peoples call entheogens, or “being with the god.”

Sacks understands that in these disorders and extreme alterations of what we call “normal,”  there are signs and symbols of experience that are sometimes evocative of the transcendental. Here, for example, is a description from  the writer Elissa Schappell describing her experience of a seizure:

I am suddenly serene … rising. There is the unseen life, the illuminated world, shimmering, flooded with more light than seems possible, rushing into my palms and the soles of my feet, the air liquid with light, so much I should be able to scoop it into my hands like water. It fills the corners of the room, runs down the walls. I am ecstatic. I don’t want it to end. Not now, not yet, just as I’m about to understand something.

As onlookers we are terrified by the sight of a seizure, and yet what are we to make of this description? For Sacks, this is the journey he is celebrating as a physician, and one we too can celebrate. Greenberg ends his review with this paragraph:

This chasm between actual and socially accepted experience is exactly what Sacks, with his gift for listening to his patients, is able to pick up. Throughout his long career, the transcribing of his patients’ experiences has been a kind of necessity, the truest way to comprehend and “come to terms with them emotionally.” This unique attentiveness has not only amplified our understanding of the range of human experience, it has elevated his investigations into the realm of art.

I would argue that the range of human experience here is not just in the realm of art, but also in the realm of philosophy and transformative psychology as well, and that Sacks is a genuine role model for the work of this university because he begins with a respect for the empirical but is drawn by wonder and temperament to a higher plane, one which we also seek to occupy.

by Richard Geldard, Ph.D.

 

Dr. Jeffrey Mishlove Discusses Transformational Psychology

Dr. Jeffrey Mishlove, Program Dean for Transformational Psychology at the University of Philosphical Research, discusses the M.A. Program in Transformational Psychology and UPR’s unique approach to the subject.

Emerson and The Dream of America

By Professor Richard G. Geldard

As we approach this crucial election, I want to reflect for a moment on the influence of one of our founding thinkers on the issues before the American electorate. Ralph Waldo Emerson is widely known for his concept of self-reliance. For many years, the idea of self-reliance has been the Great American Idea, and for many it meant to “do your own thing,” to have the freedom and independence to pursue whatever you wanted in this great country where anyone could achieve his or her personal dream of success and happiness.

But like any superficial reading of a great text, “Self-Reliance” never meant to be a licence to pursue our dreams at the expense of others or to accept what some conceived to be Darwin’s evolutionary notion of “the survival of the fittest.” Emerson has even been mistakenly connected to the egocentric assertions of Ayn Rand, whose ideas have lately been resurrected by the American Right Wing.

We are all familiar with the dangers of simple-mindedness and superficial understanding, and Emerson himself said that Americans had an unfortunate tendency toward superficiality, and he spent his lifetime and creative energy in the selfless effort to correct that fault in our character.

In my latest book on the thought of this great thinker, Emerson and the Dream of America, I have continued what I believe was Emerson’s goal of providing a mature and truthful vision for the future of America. The true meaning of self-reliance is the spiritual principle of self-trust, the realization that we possess within our nature the strength and capacity for finding our true path in life and even for discovering the very ground of our being. And what is true for
us as individuals is also true for the nation.

Chapter four of Emerson and the Dream of America is entitled “The New Self-Reliance,” and I said in part, I entitled this chapter “The New Self-Reliance” because it is clear now that since Emerson’s first assertions of this theme one hundred forty years ago, we may have assimilated personally and culturally some of the language and substance of his intention, but we have yet to manifest his words in matters of national character. To some extent some of the spiritual and self-development movements have absorbed this material and have formulated and reformulated its essence and principles into systems of enlightenment and self-recovery. What remains is the actual work and its realization to a larger sphere.

Unfortunately, this narrower development has also evolved into the presence of self serving gurus merchandising what can never be sold or merchandised. Emerson himself has been reduced to a purveyor of slogans and aphorisms empty of meaning outside their context.

And yet there remains a powerful essence coming from the man’s words that has been absorbed and may now being put to work in the culture.

What presents itself in this election is a clear choice between a true understanding of Emerson’s vision and a false one based on a superficial understanding of it. Emerson wrote of an America with an understanding of achieving the dream of equality and justice as the hallmark of spiritual maturity and not an America bent on the selfish principle of “every man for himself.” If America was the land of opportunity, as the cliche has always been expressed, the dream was meant for every citizen, with a level playing field which supported a genuine understanding of equality of opportunity, not only before the law but also in the minds and hearts of all Americans. That we are still a great distance from that goal makes it doubly important that we not slide back now into the darkness of greed and selfish grasping for ourselves at the expense of others. And it is Emerson, more than any other American writer and thinker, who described for us not only why America is uniquely placed to achieve this dream, but also exactly how each one of us can proceed to embody it.

As a matter of public record, I might mention that right after the election of 2008, Penguin Books published a small book containing President Obama’s Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address and Emerson’s essay “Self-Reliance.” We know that “Self-Reliance” is a meaningful document for the president, and the publication is also a recognition of the place of Emerson’s essay in the American pantheon of great texts.

 

Jeffrey Mishlove – Radio Interview

Jeffrey Mishlove, Dean of Transformational PsychologyA few days ago the Dean of our Transformational Psychology degree program was interviewed on the national radio program, Coast to Coast AM. The topic: Parapsychology & Psychokinesis. We’ve captured a few highlights from the interview which you can listen to or download here:

>> DOWNLOAD MP3

 

 

UPR Professor Dr. Debashish Banerji Publishes Article in Integral Review

University of Philosophical Research Integral Review ArticleDr. Debashish Banerji has published an article in the Integral Review entitled: Structure and Process:  Integral Philosophy and Triple Transformation.
This article looks at the ongoing debate between perennialism and pluralism in  religious studies and considers the category of the integral, as described by Sri Aurobindo (1872-1950) in the context of this debate. After exploring the case for perennialism vis-à-vis pluralism, it compares the contemporary  taxonomy of a perennial core to mystical experience developed by Robert K. C. Forman with the idea of the “triple transformation” developed by Sri Aurobindo as a way to the realization of an “integral consciousness.”
Through this consideration, it indicates the aporetic nature of an integralism which can simultaneously uphold the concerns of perennialism and pluralism non-reductively. Such an aporetic goal challenges the epistemological assumptions of the modern knowledge  academy and is shown to make sense only as an ever deferred processual ontology as against the knowledge academy’s telos of a totalistic structuralism.

Origins of the Olympics

Interesting-Olympic-Facts-Mount-Olympus-GreeceThe Olympic games are named after mount Olympus in Greece, the home of the Greek gods. They are rooted in Greek legend, a time for the gods to enjoy the delight of play and of the display of physical prowess in friendly competition. According to Greek mythology, the earliest such games were played by lesser gods known as the Dactyls. The dactyl Heracles raced with his two brothers. He crowned the victor with a laurel wreath. Following this, all the Olympian gods participated in friendly contests of  wrestling, running and jumping. There are other myths relating to the origin of these games but they all pertain to a vision of joyful feats of physical prowess.

The Greeks held to an ideal of “a perfect mind in a perfect body” and the Olympics were made into an occasion for the display of physical perfection. The earliest Olympic games among the Greeks were held at least as far back as 8th c. BCE in Olympia on the Peloponnesos peninsula. Women and slaves were not allowed in these games, which were held in honor of Zeus. The earliest games in Olympia for women go back to the 6th c. BCE and took the form of running races to gain the privilege of being a priestess for the goddess Hera. A parallel contest for the men was conducted to choose a consort for the priestess to aid in the religious rites.  Being a display of the body beautiful, the tradition of physical nudity was introduced to games in the 8th c. BCE, perhaps by the Spartans, and was adopted early in the Olympics. This celebration of the beauty of physical form also took a cultural turn, with famous sculptors vying to outdo each other in depicting the athletes in their sculptures.

The various city-states of ancient Greece participated in these games,  for which any warring states stopped their conflict to follow the Olympic Truce, so that participants and viewers received safe passage and the human ideal represented by the games was honored over regional or personal differences. From an early stage (and perhaps from the inception), the games were held every four years, a unit of time known as the olympiad, which was used in state reckonings. The ancient Greek Olympics continued after Greece came under Roman rule, until the late 4th c., when the Roman emperor Theodosius I put a stop to them as part of a suppression of paganism in favor of making  Christianity the state religion.

In modern times, the first significant attempt to revive the Olympics occurred in Revolutionary France between 1796-1798. There were a few more attempts in between but the modern Olympics was initiated after the founding of the International Olympic Committee by Baron Pierre de Coubertin in 1890. The first modern international Olympics were held in Athens, Greece in 1896. Fourteen nations with 241 athletes participated. The tradition of holding the games once every four years was also revived. Based on earlier articles of the British Olympic Foundation, the International Olympic Charter was adopted. This charter aimed to maintain the spirit of friendly celebration of the powers of the human body in joyful competitive sports in which the spirit of goodwill predominated over success and failure. Since the 1896 Athens Olympics, there have been 27 Olympics in four year intervals with three interruptions due to World Wars I and II. Though the Summer Olympics are considered the main international event, there are also Winter Olympics, now in two-year intervals from the Summer Olympics.

With the present Olympics, London U.K. has hosted the games thrice and altogether 43 nations have hosted the games and most nations of the world participate. Los Angeles has hosted the games twice, in 1932 and 1984. The largest number of records in athletic performance have been and continue to be broken during these games, in keeping with the spirit of physical perfection of the human being worldwide which they are meant to showcase.

From a pan-Grecian recurrent memorialization of an aspect of the human ideal, we have moved into a global celebration. The Olympics today represents a planet-wide acknowledgment of the human urge to perfection, enacted at the physical level. Similarly, UPR, a contemporary wisdom academy, celebrates in its curricula and educational programs an integral ideal of perpetual human progress. Though physical skill is certainly a universal aspect of this ideal, UPR exists to further the powers of mind and spirit which inhabit the body and are in profound need of development and exercise if we are to live harmoniously together as human beings on and with the earth. UPR mines the wisdom traditions of the world, including that of ancient Greece, India, China, East and West Asia and other cultural heritages and engages these with new emergent knowledge paradigms to seek solutions to the problems of our times. Our Master’s programs in Consciousness Studies and Transformational Psychology are meant to prepare global citizens with the skills and capacities to navigate the planet towards a more sustainable and holistic future.

Mosaic of Music Featuring Veera Asher

 

Inspire 2 Inspire, LLC presents

MOSAIC OF MUSIC

featuring
Veera Khare Asher, Soprano
& Invited Guests

JAZZ | POP | BROADWAY | OPERA

Sunday, August 26th, 2012
2:30 pm – 5:00 pm

UPRS Auditorium
3910 Los Feliz Blvd.
Los Angeles, 90027

FREE PARKING

Admission Prices by Suggested Donation:
Adults $25 | Students & Seniors $15 | Kids $10
No Advanced Ticketing Required

 

Myron, Ancient Greek Sculptor, Visits the London Olympics

Dr Richard GeldardWe asked faculty member and scholar of early Greek thought, Richard Geldard, Ph.D., to share an impression of what an early Grecian might think of our modern Olympiad.

As a faculty member of the University of Philosophical Research, Dr. Richard Geldard lectures on The Birth of Consciousness in Early Greek Thought and Emerson and American Idealism at the University of Philosophical Research. He holds a doctorate in Dramatic Literature and Classics from Stanford University and is a regular contributor to the Huffington Post.

Below is his concept of what Myron might have thought:

Imagine, if you will, the Olympic Organizing Committee for the 2012 Games in London deciding that, as part of their preparations for the games, they will invite a spirit from the ancient games to be a guest.

After some debate, they decide to ask the great Classical sculptor Myron, whose signature piece, The Discus Thrower, has graced the modern games throughout the modern era.

The committee presents Myron with a modern Greek guide to help him navigate the current games who can speak to him in his foreign tongue (the Greek language revitalizes itself every 400 years).

Myron-The-Discus-ThrowerAt the opening ceremonies, Myron finds almost nothing that he understands from his years spent at the sacred sanctuary in Olympia. He is relieved of his confusion only when his guide shares with him that the torch that is being carried into the stadium was lit months before within the same ancient sanctuary.

Myron, unfortunately, is quite dismayed that, not only are women present at the London games, but are active participants, even in the discus and javelin events. The guide also tells Myron not be surprised to see women competing in wrestling and boxing.

As the opening ceremonies come to an end, Myron is pleased to hear something familiar—translated, of course by his guide—the charge to the athletes to follow the rules, not to cheat and to compete with honor and respect for one another and the Olympic movement.

At the gymnastics arena, our ancient visitor studies the male competitors carefully and finds himself quite satisfied that the human form still manifests the godlike ideal celebrated in his own sculptures of bronze. He sees poise, control, coordination, and skill, as well as courage under great pressure in each of the contestants.

Later, at the great stadium, he holds a discus in his hands like a cherished object, feeling its weight and shape. He is grateful that, at least this object has been passed down as a token of the sacred experience he once portrayed in his art.

Asked by his guide which Olympic events were the most popular in his time, Myron smiles and replies that, without doubt, the trials of combat, especially wrestling and boxing. Many ancient texts describe heroic feats of strength and endurance over many hours, with special honors given to victories in three or four Olympiads.

Myron explains that, in recognition of special performance, officials of the victor`s city authorize that a section of the city`s defensive walls be torn down to create a special entranceway for the victor. And even though the laurel leaves soon fade, the city will honor the returning hero with lifetime lodging and food. They may even commission a statue, and in special cases, make a gift of it to the sanctuary at Delphi.

As the games come to an end Myron asks his guide if all hostilities in the world cease in order to allow athletes and audiences to travel in safety to the London Olympics as they did to the ancient games. “Alas, no,” the guide explains, “the world no longer respects the games as they once did.”

Myron says that when he returns to the world of shadows, he will report that the new world order has forgotten much, but that in most events, through much effort and dedication, there is an understanding of what remains to be achieved, that there is something higher, deeper to be realized and understood and that all is not lost, not yet.

Origins of the Olympics

Emerson’s Declaration of Spiritual Independence

By Philip Goldberg
www.AmericanVeda.com

July 15, was the anniversary of an important event in America’s religious history.

On July 15, 1838, Ralph Waldo Emerson addressed the graduating class at Harvard Divinity School, his alma mater. His audience that day was small — the school’s only six graduates, their families and the faculty — but the reverberations were so great that the poet Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (father of the Supreme Court Justice), called the speech “our intellectual Declaration of Independence.”

Emerson was 35 at the time, and had already given up his ministry — “self-defrocked” as he put it — in large part because his study of Eastern religions “dispelled once and for all the dream about Christianity being the sole revelation.” He had also published the seminal essay “Nature,” which had launched his career as a lecturer and put the Transcendentalist movement on the map. In it was this memorable description of union with the divine:

“Standing on the bare ground,–my head bathed by the blithe air, and uplifted into infinite space,–all mean egotism vanishes. I become a transparent eye-ball; I am nothing; I see all; the currents of the Universal Being circulate through me; I am part or particle of God.”

If that sounds Eastern it’s because Emerson was strongly influenced by the Hindu and Buddhist texts that found their way to New England in his boyhood.

In the Divinity School Address, the Sage of Concord did the religious equivalent of speaking truth to power. “Let me admonish you first of all to go alone,” he told the ministers-to-be, “to refuse the good models, even those which are sacred in the imagination of men, and dare to love God without mediator or veil.” He called for less blind obedience to doctrine; he excoriated ordinary preaching as coming “out of the memory, and not out of the soul”; and he spoke of the typical Sunday service with such disdain that it’s a wonder anyone present ever attended church again. “Whenever the pulpit is usurped by a formalist,” he said, “then is the worshipper defrauded and disconsolate.”

What mattered, he declared, was to encounter the Infinite directly. He accused “historical Christianity” of engaging in “noxious exaggeration about the person of Jesus,” calling it a “perversion” to say that one person alone was by nature divine and the rest of us are not. Christianity, he said, had become “a Mythus,” like the religions of Greece and Egypt, and had turned Christ into “a demigod,” like Apollo or Osiris.

This was radical stuff in pre-Civil War America. Emerson was essentially turning religion 180 degrees on its axis. Instead of a deity presiding over creation from somewhere up there, divinity was here, there and everywhere. What we call God is the essence of all that is, the “cause behind every stump and clod,” and it is within us, as our own essential nature. “That which shows God in me, fortifies me,” he said at Harvard. “That which shows God out of me, makes me a wart and a wen” (wen = cyst). In the Emersonian vision, as in that of the Eastern sages, we are neither fallen nor depraved, and divinity incarnates at every instant, not just not just once in the distant past. “God is, not was,” he said, and each of us is “an infinite Soul” who is “drinking forever the soul of God.”

His lesson for the future ministers was plain: “Cast behind you all conformity and acquaint men firsthand with Deity.”

The speech was well received by the students, who had invited Emerson in the first place, but the rest of the crowd was not pleased. When the text was published, clerics and theologians were outraged. Emerson said, proudly, that he had been “raised into the importance of a heretic.” Harvard declared him persona non grata, but 28 years later, after he’d become a superstar, the school gave him an honorary doctorate.

The Emersonian vision is alive today in all the independent seekers who pursue firsthand the “indwelling Supreme Spirit.” July 15 marks the 174th anniversary of the Divinity School Address. The date should be commemorated by everyone who insists on critical thinking in religious matters and by everyone who knows that “the doors of the temple stand open, night and day, before every man, and the oracles of this truth cease never.”

New Course Available: Emerson & American Idealism

PHI 522 – will explore the work and thought of American philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson through the development of what came to be known as Transcendentalism.  We will study how this philosophy developed from the Perennial Philosophy through European Idealism to become a unique expression of a vital philosophical vision.

Session   1 |  Beginnings: Emerson and American Idealism
Session   2 |  Primary Sources: Influences and Inspiration
Session   3 |  The Birth of New England Transcendentalism
Session   4 |  The Eight Principles
Session   5 |  The Over-Soul and Universal Mind
Session   6 |  Spiritual Laws and Experience
Session   7 |  Compensation and Fate
Session   8 |  Idealism and the New Physics
Session   9 |  The Authentic Life
Session 10 |  The Examined Life

CLICK HERE to watch the video,
read the professor’s bio, and get the
full course description.